Response was supurb and listen abilitity to requirements amazing. Best Agent to deal with with kind caring and understanding service.
When the leasing authority was signed, nearly two months before the property was advertised, I was advised by the rental team that the expected market rent was approximately $775 per week. Then, just one week before the property was due to be advertised, I was advised that the market was showing renewed interest and that $800 per week was achievable. Based on that advice, the property was subsequently advertised at $800 per week. Approximately a week and a half later, I was advised that the market was no longer supporting $800 per week and that the rent should be reduced to $775 per week. A further week later, the recommendation was to reduce it again to $750 per week. Another week later, it was reduced to $725 per week, at which point the property was finally rented. I am not necessarily suggesting that the property was ultimately under-valued at $725 per week. My concern is the significant variation in the rental advice provided over such a short period. Moving from an assessment of $775 per week, to confidence that $800 per week was achievable, and then ultimately reducing the rent to $725 per week within approximately one month suggests a lack of accurate knowledge or confidence in the rental market. In the current economic environment, where rental prices have generally been increasing, I would have expected a more accurate assessment of the market from the outset. If the market was realistically $725 per week, we could have commenced the campaign at that price, potentially attracting a stronger pool of applicants and securing a suitable tenant sooner. Ultimately, my concern is less about the final rental amount and more about the inconsistent pricing strategy and the quality of the market advice provided throughout the leasing process.
Highly professional team and communicate effectively to solve problems while handling vacant tenant and for the new leasing.
Have been helpful and efficient on getting any problem resolved. Very responsive
Absolute pleasure dealing with such a wonderful professional organisation. Every communication was delivered with kindness and attention to detail in a very timely manner. I would recommend them to anyone who wants to deal with a market leader.
The Ray White team did a great job with re-leasing our property. Great advice on what we needed to do to prepare the property, and they ran a thorough process to select a quality candidate. Thanks!
Easy to deal with. Always available.
Cailin Posthumus from Ray White had excellent customer service. Friendly, responsive and happy to answer all the questions. After so many agents being cold and robotic Calin was a refreshing gear change to a very exhausting process. I was never made to feel like a chore and he always kept me updated if there was even a marginal delay with anything. Thank you so much Calin for being a great real estate agent. Highly recommend!
Easy communication with excellent service made the whole experience very comfortable. Would recommend!
We are tenants with Ray White Bayside group for nearly 9 years and appreciate the prompt and professional services received. Thank you!
Based on most reviews in the last 12 months

(647 reviews)



Reviews in Cheltenham
Rented
For Rent
Landlord of 36 Primrose Avenue, Cheltenham
When the leasing authority was signed, nearly two months before the property was advertised, I was advised by the rental team that the expected market rent was approximately $775 per week. Then, just one week before the property was due to be advertised, I was advised that the market was showing renewed interest and that $800 per week was achievable. Based on that advice, the property was subsequently advertised at $800 per week. Approximately a week and a half later, I was advised that the market was no longer supporting $800 per week and that the rent should be reduced to $775 per week. A further week later, the recommendation was to reduce it again to $750 per week. Another week later, it was reduced to $725 per week, at which point the property was finally rented. I am not necessarily suggesting that the property was ultimately under-valued at $725 per week. My concern is the significant variation in the rental advice provided over such a short period. Moving from an assessment of $775 per week, to confidence that $800 per week was achievable, and then ultimately reducing the rent to $725 per week within approximately one month suggests a lack of accurate knowledge or confidence in the rental market. In the current economic environment, where rental prices have generally been increasing, I would have expected a more accurate assessment of the market from the outset. If the market was realistically $725 per week, we could have commenced the campaign at that price, potentially attracting a stronger pool of applicants and securing a suitable tenant sooner. Ultimately, my concern is less about the final rental amount and more about the inconsistent pricing strategy and the quality of the market advice provided throughout the leasing process.

Reviews in Cheltenham
Rented
For Rent

Reviews in Cheltenham
Rented
For Rent
Based on properties leased in the last 12 months

(647 reviews)



Reviews in Cheltenham
Rented
For Rent
Landlord of 36 Primrose Avenue, Cheltenham
When the leasing authority was signed, nearly two months before the property was advertised, I was advised by the rental team that the expected market rent was approximately $775 per week. Then, just one week before the property was due to be advertised, I was advised that the market was showing renewed interest and that $800 per week was achievable. Based on that advice, the property was subsequently advertised at $800 per week. Approximately a week and a half later, I was advised that the market was no longer supporting $800 per week and that the rent should be reduced to $775 per week. A further week later, the recommendation was to reduce it again to $750 per week. Another week later, it was reduced to $725 per week, at which point the property was finally rented. I am not necessarily suggesting that the property was ultimately under-valued at $725 per week. My concern is the significant variation in the rental advice provided over such a short period. Moving from an assessment of $775 per week, to confidence that $800 per week was achievable, and then ultimately reducing the rent to $725 per week within approximately one month suggests a lack of accurate knowledge or confidence in the rental market. In the current economic environment, where rental prices have generally been increasing, I would have expected a more accurate assessment of the market from the outset. If the market was realistically $725 per week, we could have commenced the campaign at that price, potentially attracting a stronger pool of applicants and securing a suitable tenant sooner. Ultimately, my concern is less about the final rental amount and more about the inconsistent pricing strategy and the quality of the market advice provided throughout the leasing process.

Reviews in Cheltenham
Rented
For Rent
Reviews collected on RateMyAgent will appear here

Reviews in Cheltenham
Rented
For Rent
Reviews collected on RateMyAgent will appear here